Loading (50 kb)...'

(continued)

(v) June 15, 1974—Initiate onsite modifications, if applicable.

(vi) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite modifications, if applicable.

(vii) July 1, 1975—Achieve compliance with the requirements of Knox County Air Pollution Control Regulations, section 18.4B and City of Memphis Air Pollution Control Code and Shelby County Air Pollution Control Code Section 3–24 (b) and certify such compliance to the Administrator.

(7) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (e)(5) of this section who elects to utilize stack gas desulfurization shall be subject to the following compliance schedule:

(i) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a final control plan, which describes at a minimum the steps which will be taken by the source to achieve compliance with the applicable regulation.

(ii) January 1, 1974—Negotiate and sign all necessary contracts for emission control systems or process modification, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification.

(iii) February 1, 1974—Initiate onsite construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification.

(iv) May 1, 1975—Complete onsite construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification.

(v) July 1, 1975—Achieve compliance with the applicable regulation and certify such compliance to the Administrator.

(8) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(16) of this section, the owner or operator of any stationary source subject to the following emission limiting regulation of the Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Regulations contained as part of the Tennessee implementation plan shall comply with the compliance schedule in paragraph (e)(9) of this section: Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Regulations, rule 10 (particulate emissions from process operations).

(9) Compliance schedule. (i) September 15, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a final control plan, which describes at a minimum the steps which will be taken by the source to achieve compliance with the applicable regulations.

(ii) November 1, 1973—Negotiate and sign all necessary contracts for emission control systems or process modifications, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification.

(iii) December 1, 1973—Initiate onsite construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modifications.

(iv) June 1, 1974—Complete onsite construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification.

(v) July 1, 1974—Achieve compliance with the applicable regulations, and certify such compliance to the Administrator.

(10) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(16) of this section, the owner or operator of any process (non-fuel burning) source of sulfur dioxide subject to the emission limiting requirements of the Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Regulations, rule 13, contained as part of the Tennessee implementation plan shall comply with the compliance schedule in paragraph (e)(9) of this section.

(11) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(16) of this section, the owner or operator of any boiler or furnace of more than 250 million Btu per hour heat input subject to the sulfur dioxide emission limiting requirements of the Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Regulations, rule 13, contained as part of the Tennessee implementation plan shall notify the Administrator, no later than October 1, 1973, of his intent to utilize either low-sulfur fuel or stack gas desulfurization to meet these requirements.

(12) Any owner or operator of a fuel burning facility subject to paragraph (e)(11) of this section who elects to utilize low-sulfur fuel shall be subject to the following compliance schedule:

(i) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a projection of the amount of fuel, by types, that will be substantially adequate to enable compliance with the applicable regulation on July 1, 1974, and for at least one year thereafter.

(ii) December 1, 1973—Sign contracts with fuel suppliers for fuel requirements as projected above.

(iii) January 1, 1974—Submit a statement as to whether boiler modifications will be required. If modifications will be required, submit plans for such modifications.

(iv) February 1, 1974—Let contracts for necessary boiler modifications, if applicable.

(v) February 15, 1974—Initiate onsite modifications, if applicable.

(vi) June 15, 1974—Complete onsite modifications, if applicable.

(vii) July 1, 1974—Achieve compliance with the requirements of Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Regulations, rule 13, and certify such compliance to the Administrator.

(13) Any owner or operator of a fuel burning facility subject to paragraph (e)(11) of this section who elects to utilize stack gas desulfurization shall be subject to the following compliance schedule:

(i) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a final control plan, which describes at a minimum the steps which will be taken by the source to achieve compliance with the applicable regulations.

(ii) December 1, 1973—Negotiate and sign all necessary contracts for emission control systems or process modifications, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification.

(iii) December 15, 1973—Initiate onsite construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification.

(iv) June 15, 1974—Complete onsite construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification.

(v) July 1, 1974—Achieve compliance with the applicable regulations, and certify such compliance to the Administrator.

(14) If a performance test is necessary for a determination as to whether compliance has been achieved, such a test must be completed by the final compliance date in the applicable regulation. Ten days prior to such a test, notice must be given to the Administrator to afford him the opportunity to have an observer present.

(15) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule above shall certify to the Administrator, within five days after the deadline for each increment of progress in that schedule, whether or not the increment has been met.

(16)(i) None of the above paragraphs shall apply to a source which is presently in compliance with applicable regulations and which has certified such compliance to the Administrator by October 1, 1973. The Administrator may request whatever supporting information he considers necessary for proper certification.

(ii) Any compliance schedule adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.

(iii) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule in this paragraph may submit to the Administrator no later than October 1, 1973, a proposed alternative compliance schedule. No such compliance schedule may provide for final compliance after the final compliance date in the applicable compliance schedule of this paragraph. If promulgated by the Administrator, such schedule shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.

(17) No compliance schedule in this paragraph shall excuse a source from complying with an interim emission limitation that is applicable to such source.

(18) Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude the Administrator from promulgating a separate schedule for any source to which the application of a compliance schedule in this paragraph fails to satisfy the requirements of §§51.261 and 51.262(a) of this chapter.

(f) The compliance schedules for the sources identified below are approved as meeting the requirements of Subpart N and §51.6 of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State or those of a local air pollution control agency as noted.

(1) Statewide compliance schedules:


Tennessee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Location Regulation involved Date of adoption Effective date Final compliance date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aluminum Co. of America, State Alcoa................. CH.V-2(b), CH. VII-2.. Oct. 9, 1973......... Immediately.......... Aug. 9, 1974.
order No. 79-00073.
American Enka, State order No. 64-
00073:
(a) Boilers 1, 2, 3............ Morristown............ CH. V-2(b), CH.VI-2(a) ......do............. ......do............. July 1, 1975.
(b) Boilers 4, 5, 6............ ......do.............. CH. VI-2(b), CH. VI- ......do............. ......do............. Dec. 30, 1974.
2(a).
(c) Boiler 9................... ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VI- ......do............. ......do............. June 30, 1974.
2(a).
Athens Plow Co., State order No. 4- Athens................ CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- Mar. 20, 1973........ ......do............. Aug. 9, 1974.
00073. 9(b).
Athens Stove Works, State order No. ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- June 19, 1973........ ......do............. July 2, 1974.
55-0073. 9(b).
Beaunit Fibers, State order No. 56-
0073:
(a) Stacks 1 and 2............. Elizabethton.......... CH. V-2(a)............ ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 30, 1975.
(b) Stack 3.................... ......do.............. CH. VI-2(a), CH. V- ......do............. ......do............. Nov. 30, 1974.
2(a).
Bedford Lumber Co.:
State order No. 87-00073....... Shelbyville........... CH. V-2(b), CH. VI- Oct. 9, 1973......... ......do............. Mar. 1, 1974.
2(a)(2).
State order No. 88-00073....... ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VI- ......do............. ......do............. Oct. 9, 1974.
2(a)(2).
Bristol Foundry & Machine Co., Bristol............... CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- ......do............. ......do............. Nov. 9, 1973.
State order No. 71-00073. 9(b).
Bruce Flooring State order No. 72- Jackson............... CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. ......do............. ......do............. Aug. 9, 1974.
00073.
Burroughs-Ross-Colville Co.:
State order No. 65-00073: (a) McMinnville........... CH. V-2(b), CH. VI- ......do............. ......do............. Do.
Boiler 1. 2(a)2.
State order No. 66-00073:
(a) Collectors C-1, C-3........ ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- ......do............. ......do............. Do.
2(a).
(b) Collector C-7.............. ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- ......do............. ......do............. Oct. 1, 1973.
2(a).
Celotex Corp., State Order No. 61-
0073:
(a) Collectors A-1-2, B-3, B-4, Paris................. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- June 19, 1973........ ......do............. May 1, 1974.
and E-22. 2(a).
(b) Collectors D-12, D-13, and ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- ......do............. ......do............. Apr. 1, 1974.
D-14. 2(a).
(c) Collectors C-0, C-10, and C- ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- ......do............. ......do............. Oct. 30, 1973.
11. 2(a).
Clarksville Foundry & Machine Clarksville........... CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- Oct. 9, 1973......... ......do............. Jan. 30, 1974.
Works State order No. 73-00073. 9(b).
Dover Corp., State order No. 74- Middleton............. CH.V-2(b), CH. VI-2(d) ......do............. ......do............. July 9, 1974.
00073.
Farrar Construction, State order McMinnville........... CH. V-2(b), CH. VII- ......do............. ......do............. Oct. 9, 1973.
No. 75-00073. 9(g).
Harris Manufacturing Co., State Johnson City.......... CH.V-2(b), CH. VII- June 19, 1973........ ......do............. June 1, 1974.
order No. 62-0073. 2(a).
Holston Army Ammunition Plant, Kingsport............. CH.V-2(b), CH. VI-2(a) Oct. 9, 1973......... ......do............. July 1, 1975.
State order No. 67-00073.
Kingsport Foundry & ......do.............. CH.V-2(b), CH. VII- June 19, 1973........ ......do............. Feb. 28, 1974.
Manufacturing Corp., State order 9(b).
No. 57-0073.
Koh-i-noor Radiograph, Inc., State Lewisburg............. CH.V-2(b), CH. VII- ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 29, 1974.
order No. 58-0073. 2(a).
Lenoir Car Works, State order No. Lenoir City........... CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. Oct. 9, 1973......... ......do............. Dec. 9, 1973.
76-00073.
Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co., Cowan................. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. Mar. 20, 1973........ ......do............. Aug. 9, 1974.
State order No. 5-0073.
Mead Corp., State order No. 59-0073 Kingsport............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VI- June 19, 1973........ ......do............. July 1, 1975.
2(a)(1).
Monsanto Co., State order No. 6-
0073:
(a) Source 4................... Columbia.............. CH. V-2, CH. VII-2.... Mar. 20, 1973........ ......do............. Mar. 9, 1974.
(b) Source 5................... ......do.............. CH. V-2, CH. VII-2.... ......do............. ......do............. Dec. 9, 1973.
Royal Oak Charcoal Co.:
State order No. 77-00073......... Jamestown............. CH.V-2(b), CH. VII-2.. Oct. 9, 1973......... ......do............. July 31, 1974.
State order No. 78-00073......... ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH.VII-2.. ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 1, 1974.
Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., State order Tellico Plains........ CH.V-2(b), CH. VI- June 19, 1973........ ......do............. Jan. 30, 1974.
No. 63-0073. 2(a)(2).
Tennessee Asphalt Co., State order LaFollette............ CH.V-2(b), CH. VII- Oct. 9, 1973......... ......do............. Dec. 30, 1973.
No. 79-00073. 9(g).
Tennessee Eastman Co.:
State order No. 80-00073......... Kingsport............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. ......do............. ......do............. June 1, 1974.
State order No. 81-00073......... ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. ......do............. ......do............. Aug. 9, 1974.
State order No. 82-00073......... ......do.............. CH.V-2(b), CH. VII-2.. ......do............. ......do............. Nov. 1, 1974.
State order No. 83-00073......... ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. ......do............. ......do............. July 1, 1975.
State order No. 84-00073:
(a) Units 18-22................ ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH.VI- ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 1, 1974.
2(a)(1).
(b) Units 11-17................ ......do.............. CH. VI-2(b), CH. VI- ......do............. ......do............. June 1, 1975.
2(a)(1).
Tennessee Forging Steel Co., State Harriman.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. ......do............. ......do............. Oct. 30, 1973.
order No. 85-00073.
Tennessee Metallurgical, State
order No. 89-00073:
(a) Furnace No. 2.............. Kimball............... CH.V-2(b), CH. VII-2.. ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 1, 1974.
(b) Furnace No. 1.............. ......do.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. ......do............. ......do............. Jan. 15, 1974.
Union Carbide Corp., State order Columbia.............. CH. V-2(b), CH. VII-2. ......do............. ......do............. Aug. 9, 1974.
No. 86-00073.
United States Stove Co., State South Pittsburg....... CH.V-2(b)............. Mar. 20, 1973........ ......do............. Feb. 9, 1974.
order No. 3-0073.
Aluminum Co. of America, sources 22 Alcoa................. Ch. V, sec. II.B...... Nov. 28, 1973........ ......do............. July 9, 1974.
and 23 (carbon anode baking).
Berkline Corp., plant No. 1, Morristown............ Ch. V. sec. II. B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. June 9, 1974.
collector No. 6. VII, sec. II.
E. I. du Pont: 4 steam boilers, New Johnsonville...... Ch. V, sec. II. B; ch. Feb. 6, 1974......... ......do............. June 30, 1975.
particulate emissions, SO2 V, sec. II.A(2).
emissions.
Industrial Products Co., Inc.: Mt. Pleasant.......... Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. Nov. 28, 1973........ ......do............. Jan. 1, 1974.
Control equipment. VII, sec. II.
Interstate Foundry & Machine Johnson City.......... Ch. V, sec. II. B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Feb. 9, 1974.
Co.: Cupola. VII, sec. IX.B.
Laminite Plastics Corp.: Moldow Morristown............ Ch. V, sec. II. B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Apr. 30, 1974.
system (phase I only). VII, sec. II.
Lea Industries:
Plant No. 4; process emissions... ......do.............. ......do.............. ......do............. ......do............. Jan. 1, 1974.
Plant No. 5; process emissions... ......do.............. ......do.............. ......do............. ......do............. Aug. 9, 1974.
Plant No. 6; process emissions... ......do.............. ......do.............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
Plant No. 6, boiler.............. ......do.............. Ch. V................. ......do............. ......do............. Feb. 1, 1974.
Lewisburg Casting Co., Inc.: Cupola Lewisburg............. ......do.............. Nov. 28, 1979........ ......do............. June 9, 1974.
A. B. Long Quarries, Inc.: Harriman.............. Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 30, 1974.
Limestone quarry and crusher. VII, sec. II: ch.
VIII.
Monsanto Industrial Chemical Co.... Columbia.............. Ch. VII............... Feb. 6, 1973......... ......do............. July 1, 1975.
Plough, Inc.: Boiler............... Shelbyville........... Ch. V, sec. II. B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. May 30, 1974.
VI, sec. II.A(2).
Powermatic-Houdaille, Inc.: Two No. McMinnville........... Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Aug. 9, 1974.
5 cupolas. VII, sec. II.
Royal Oak Charcoal Co.: Kilns 1, 2, Cookeville............ ......do.............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
3, 4, 5.
Don P. Smith Chair Co.: Drying kiln Loudin................ ......do.............. ......do............. ......do............. June 30, 1974.
Temple Industries: Conical burner.. Savannah.............. Ch. V, sec. II. B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Apr. 30, 1974.
VI, sec. II.D.
Tennlite, Inc.: Two rotary kilns... Green Brier........... Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. July 30, 1974.
VII, sec. II.
Tenn. Asphalt Co. & Road Cumberland City....... Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Dec. 17, 1974.
Builders, Inc.: Asphalt batching VII, secs. II and IX,
plant. G; ch. VIII.
Vulcan Materials Co.: Rock quarry.. Emory Gap............. Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 31, 1974.
VII, sec. II; ch.
VIII.
Do................................ Savannah.............. Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. June 21, 1974.
VII, sec. II; ch.
VIII.
Do................................ Parsons............... Ch. V, sec. II.B; ch. ......do............. ......do............. Feb. 18, 1974.
VII, sec. II; ch.
VIII.
Cities Service (41-0073)........... Copperhill............ Ch. VII, sec. 8....... June 19, 1973........ ......do............. July 1, 1975.
Cities Service (42-0073)........... ......do.............. Ch. VII, sec. 8....... ......do............. ......do............. Do.
Penn Dixie Cement.................. Kingsport............. Ch. VII, sec. 2....... Oct. 9, 1973......... ......do............. Do.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(2) Chattanooga-Hamilton County compliance schedules:


Tennessee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Location Regulation involved Date of adoption Effective date Final compliance date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chattanooga Public Schools:
(a) Elbert Long School........... Chattanooga........... Sec. 9(8)............. Feb. 8, 1973......... Immediately.......... July 1, 1974.
(b) Charles A. Bell School....... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(c) G. Russel Brown School....... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(d) Calvin Donaldwon School...... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(e) East Chattanooga School...... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(f) Highland Park School......... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(g) Normal Park School........... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(h) Piney Woods School........... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(i) Ridgedale School............. ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(j) Frank H. Trotter School...... ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(k) Woodmore School.............. ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(l) Rivermont School............. ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(m) St. Elmo School.............. ......do.............. Sec. 9(8)............. ......do............. ......do............. Do.
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.:
(a) Nylon 66 evaporator Nos. 1-5. ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(b) Nylon auto clave Nos. 1-17... ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Do.
(c) Continuous polymerization ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Do.
lines I-III.
(d) Continuous polymerization ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Sept. 1, 1973.
line IV.
(e) Lindburg furnace type 364830- ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Aug. 1, 1973.
E12-S.
(f) Lindburg furnace type 243624- ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Feb. 1, 1974.
E12-S.
(g) Trent furnace model 862640A.. ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 1, 1974.
(h) Lindburg furnace type 364830- ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Apr. 1, 1974.
E12-S.
(i) Riley boiler................. ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. July 1, 1974.
(j) B & W boiler............. ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Do.
General Tire Service............... ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Jan. 31, 1974.
Randolph Manufacturing Co., Inc.... ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Do.
Southern Foundry Supply, Inc....... ......do.............. Sec. 9................ ......do............. ......do............. Mar. 31, 1973.
Tennessee Awning & Tent Co..... ......do.............. Sec. 9................ Feb. 9, 1973......... ......do............. June 1, 1973.
United States Pipe & Foundry Co ......do.............. Sec. 9................ Feb. 8, 1973......... ......do............. Nov. 1, 1973.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(3) Memphis-Shelby County compliance schedules:


Tennessee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Location Regulation involved Date of adoption Effective date Final compliance date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Desoto Hardwood Flooring Co.: Phase Chattanooga........... Sec. 9................ Apr. 5, 1973......... Immediately.......... May 1, 1974.
1.
Wabash, Inc.: Phase 1.............. ......do.............. Secs. 3-17, 3-20...... ......do............. ......do............. Apr. 1, 1974.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(4) Nashville-Davidson County compliance schedules:


Tennessee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Location Regulation involved Date of adoption Effective date Final compliance date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Flooring..................... Nashville............. Sec. 4-1-9............ Feb. 7, 1973......... Immediately.......... Dec. 31, 1973.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[38 FR 16169, June 20, 1973, as amended at 38 FR 22748, Aug. 23, 1973; 38 FR 24341, 24342, Sept. 7, 1973; 40 FR 3445, Jan. 22, 1975; 40 FR 3570, Jan. 23, 1975; 42 FR 10995, Feb. 25, 1977; 51 FR 40676, 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 52 FR 24367, June 30, 1987; 54 FR 25258, June 14, 1989]

§ 52.2224 Legal authority.
top
(a) The requirements of §51.230(c) of this chapter are not met since the plan does not provide the legal authority for controlling motor vehicles during air pollution emergency episodes.

(b) The requirements of §51.230(d) of this chapter are not met since statutory authority to prevent construction, modification, or operation of a facility, building, structure, or installation, or combination thereof, which indirectly results or may result in emissions of any air pollutant at any location which will prevent the maintenance of a national air quality standard is not adequate.

(c)(1) The requirements of §51.230(b) of this chapter are not met since the definition of person set forth in the Tennessee Air Quality Act and in the State implementation plan does not include facilities owned or operated by the State. Therefore, section 53–3409(f) of the Tennessee Code Annotated and section 30 of Chapter II of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Regulations are disapproved.

(2) Definition of person. For the purposes of the plan, person shall mean any individual, partnership, copartnership, firm, company, corporation, association, joint stock company, trust, estate, State-owned or operated facility, State agency, political subdivision, or any other legal entity, or their legal representatives, agents, or assigns.

(d) The requirements of §51.230(b) of this chapter are not met since the State lacks legal authority, as a result of the enactment of House Bill 1490 by the 1974 Tennessee legislature, to control emissions from the quarrying and processing of agricultural limestone. Therefore, section 53–3424 of the Tennessee Code Annotated is disapproved.

(e) The requirements of §51.230(b) of this chapter are not met since the State lacks legal authority, as a result of the enactment of House Bill 1845 by the 1974 Tennessee legislature, to control emissions from air contaminant sources which use woodwaste only as fuel. Therefore, the last sentence of section 53–3422 of the Tennessee Code Annotated is disapproved.

[37 FR 10894, May 31, 1972]

Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting §52.2224, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and on GPO Access.

§ 52.2225 VOC rule deficiency correction.
top
(a) Revisions to sections 7–3, 7–13, and 7–24 of the Tennessee regulations are approved. These amendments are in response to the Clean Air Act section 182(a)(2)(A) requirement to submit RACT rules correcting deficiencies in the existing SIP in accordance with EPA's pre-amendment guidance. These deficiencies were first noted in a letter from Greer Tidwell, the EPA Region IV Administrator, to Governor McWherter on May 26, 1988, and clarified in a letter dated June 10, 1988, from Winston Smith, EPA Region IV Air Division Director, to Paul Bontrager, Director of the Air Pollution Control Division of the Metropolitan Health Department for Nashville/Davidson County, and were further identified in EPA guidance including the Blue Book and the proposed Post–87 policy. The following deficiency in the Tennessee Regulations, however, has not been corrected.

(1) Section 7–25, “Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements” Nashville/Davidson County committed in a letter dated May 7, 1991, to include a separate provision that requires records to be maintained for at least two years. This additional provision, which is scheduled for a July 15, 1992, public hearing, will be submitted to EPA shortly after that date and will be acted upon separately.

(2) In Section 7–3, Petition for Alternative Controls, the words “as applied” should be added to the term “VOC/gallon solids” as a clarification.

(3) The term “vapor-tight” should be defined in section 7–13.

(4) “Once-in/always-in” is missing from the applicability section of the individual rules.

(5) Section 7–25, “Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements” should be revised to include additional requirements that would contain: units of compliance consistent with the performance requirements; applicable time periods for data entries; and a clear, separate provision that requires records to be kept.

(b)–(c) [Reserved]

[56 FR 10173, Mar. 11, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 28626, June 26, 1992; 59 FR 18317, Apr. 18, 1994; 60 FR 10508, Feb. 27, 1995; 61 FR 37390, July 18, 1996]

§ 52.2226 Extensions.
top
The Administrator hereby extends for 18 months (until July 1, 1980) the statutory deadline for submittal of a plan to attain the secondary SO2 standard in Copperhill.

(a) [Reserved]

(b) The Administrator hereby extends for 18 months (until July 1, 1980) the statutory timetable for submittal of Tennessee's plans to attain and maintain the secondary ambient standard for particulate matter in the Chattanooga, Columbia, Kingsport, Memphis, and Nashville nonattainment areas (40 CFR 81.343).

[45 FR 2034, Jan. 10, 1980, as amended at 45 FR 8008, Feb. 6, 1980]

§ 52.2227 Prevention of air pollution emergency episodes.
top
(a) The requirements of §51.152(a) of this chapter are not met since the plan does not provide for the enforcement of emission control actions for mobile sources during air pollution emergency episodes.

[37 FR 10895, May 31, 1972, as amended at 51 FR 40677, Nov. 7, 1986]

§ 52.2228 Review of new sources and modifications.
top
(a) Part D—Conditional approval. The Nashville-Davidson County regulation for the review of new sources and modifications in nonattainment areas is approved on condition that the State by October 31, 1984, submit a revision limiting source shutdown credit for offsets to replacement units, and, in the interim, assure implementation of the regulation in conformity with Federal requirements.

(b) Section 123—Conditional approval. The plan's provision for implementation of the requirements of section 123 of the Clean Air Act in Nashville-Davidson County is approved on condition that the State by October 31, 1984, submit:

(1) Definitions in the local regulation of nearby and excessive concentration and

(2) Provision in the local regulation for public notification and opportunity for hearing in cases where stack heights in excess of normal good engineering practice are proposed on the basis of fluid modeling demonstrations, and, in the interim, assure implementation of the local regulation in conformity with Federal requirements.

(c) The State of Tennessee proposed to delete section 1200–3–18–.03 “Standard for New Sources” from the Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP) and the Memphis-Shelby County portion of the Tennessee SIP. EPA is disapproving the deletion of this rule for the Tennessee SIP because Tennessee does not have federally approved New Source Review (NSR) regulations which apply to some of the sources in this chapter. EPA is approving the deletion of this rule for the Memphis submittal because the federally approved TN NSR applies to the Memphis-Shelby County area.

(d) The State of Tennessee proposed to delete rule 1200–3–18-.03 “Standard for New Sources” from the Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP). In paragraph (e) of this section, EPA disapproved the deletion of this rule because Tennessee did not have federally approved New Source Review (NSR) regulations that applied to some of the sources in this chapter. EPA is hereby approving the deletion of section 1200–3–18-.03 of the Tennessee SIP, and is deleting EPA's earlier disapproval in paragraph (e) of this section.

[39 FR 7284, Feb. 25, 1974, as amended at 48 FR 50080, Oct. 31, 1983; 50 FR 32413, Aug. 12, 1985; 51 FR 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 59 FR 18317, Apr. 18, 1994; 60 FR 7917, Feb. 10, 1995; 60 FR 33924, June 29, 1995]

§ 52.2229 Rules and regulations.
top
(a) The following portions of the revised Memphis and Shelby County regulations submitted on July 7, 1986, are disapproved because they are inconsistent with EPA policy and requirements:


16–77, Rules 1200–3–9–.01(3); 1200–3–9–.01(4)(o)(2)


(b) Knox County Regulation 25.2.B, submitted July 7, 1986, is disapproved because it is inconsistent with EPA policy and requirements.

[54 FR 25458, June 15, 1989, as amended at 54 FR 31954, Aug. 3, 1989]

§ 52.2230 Attainment dates for national standards.
top
The following table presents the latest dates by which the national standards are to be attained. The dates reflect the information presented in Tennessee's plan.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollutant
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air quality control region Particulate matter Sulfur oxides
-------------------------------------------- Nitrogen Carbon Ozone
Primary Secondary Primary Secondary dioxide monoxide
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Tennessee-Southwestern
Virginia Interstate:
a. Sullivan County: Bristol and d d c c b b d
Kingsport nonattainment areas
\1\.............................
b. Campbell County nonattainment d d c c b b b
areas \1\.......................
c. Anderson/Knox County c d c c b b b
nonattainment area \1\..........
d. Copperhill nonattainment area c c d f b b b
\1\.............................
e. Knox County nonattainment area c c c c b d d
\1\.............................
f. Bradley County nonattainment c c c c b b d
area \1\........................
g. Roane County nonattainment c c c c b b d
area............................
h. Rest of AQCR.................. c c c c b b b
Tennessee River Valley-Cumberland c c c c b b b
Mountains Intrastate..............
Middle Tennessee Intrastate:
a. Benton/Humphreys County c c d d b b c
nonattainment areas \1\.........
b. Davidson County nonattainment d d c c b e d
area \1\........................
c. Maury County nonattainment c c b b b b d
area \1\........................
d. Rest of AQCR.................. c c b b b b c
Western Tennessee Intrastate:
a. Benton/Humphreys County c c d d b b b
nonattainment area \1\..........
b. Rest of AQCR.................. c c b b b b b
Chattanooga Interstate:
a. Hamilton County nonattainment c c b b b b d
area \1\........................
b. Rest of AQCR.................. c c b b b b b
Metropolitan Memphis:
a. Shelby County nonattainment c c b b b e d
area \1\........................
b. Rest of AQCR.................. c c b b b b c
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For more precise delineation, see § 81.343 of this chapter.
a. Air quality levels presently below primary standards or area is unclassifiable.
b. Air quality levels presently below secondary standards or area is unclassifiable.
c. July 1975.
d. December 31, 1982.
e. December 31, 1987.
f. 18-month extension granted.


[45 FR 53818, Aug. 13, 1980, as amended at 45 FR 75661, Nov. 17, 1980; 49 FR 1343, Jan. 11, 1984]

§ 52.2231 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides and particulate matter.
top
(a) Part D conditional approval. The Chattanooga primary TSP plan's provisions for review of new sources and modifications in the nonattainment area are approved on condition that the State submit by December 31, 1987, a definition of the term Federally enforceable and provisions for making Federally enforceable all limitations, conditions, and offsets, including permit restrictions, relied upon under the plan, and in the interim, implement these provisions in a manner consistent with EPA requirements.

(b) In letters dated March 9 and April 15, 1988, the Tennessee Department of Health and Environment certified that no emission limits in the State's plan are based on dispersion techniques not permitted by EPA's stack height rules. This certification does not apply to: Dupont (43–07–02); Tennessee Valley Authority—Johnsonville (43–11–1 thru 10); Tennessee Chemical Company (70–04–21); Tennessee Eastman (82–03–15–19); A.E. Staley (53–81–18, 19, 34, 31); Cargill Inc., Memphis; and Grace Chemical Company, Millington.

[52 FR 15498, Apr. 29, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 25454, June 15, 1989]

§ 52.2232 [Reserved]
top
§ 52.2233 Significant deterioration of air quality.
top
(a)(1) Paragraph 1200–3–9–.01(4)–(0)–2. of Tennessee's regulations is disapproved because it does not require that the consent of the Governor(s) of affected states be obtained when innovative technology waivers are granted. EPA retains permitting authority for sources requesting innovative technology waivers which would significantly impact air quality in adjacent states.

(2) Tennessee's definition of stationary source specifically excludes the activities of any Vessel. This exclusion is not currently approvable and EPA is deferring action on it pending final rulemaking on the issue. EPA retains authority for permits which involve vessel emissions where a source is not willing to include all vessel emissions in the definition of source.

(b) The requirements of §52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made part of the applicable SIP for the State of Tennessee for the following purposes:

(1) Permitting of sources requesting innovative technology waivers which would significantly impact air quality in adjacent states.

(2) Permitting of sources involving vessel emissions where the source is unwilling to include all vessel emissions in the definition of source.

(c) (1) All applications and other information required pursuant to §52.21 of this part from sources located or to be located in the State of Tennessee shall be submitted to the Division of Air Pollution Control, Tennessee Department of Public Health, 256 Capitol Hill Building, Nashville, Tennessee 37219.

[42 FR 36456, July 15, 1977, and 43 FR 26410, June 19, 1978, as amended at 50 FR 7779, Feb. 26, 1985; 68 FR 11324, Mar. 10, 2003; 68 FR 74490, Dec. 24, 2003]

§ 52.2234 Visibility protection.
top
(a) The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met because the plan does not include approvable procedures meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.305 and 51.307 for protection of visibility in mandatory Class I Federal areas.

(b) Regulations for visibility monitoring and new source review. The provisions of §§52.26, 52.27, and 52.28 are hereby incorporated and made part of the applicable plan for the State of Tennessee.

(c) Long-term strategy. The provisions of §52.29 are hereby incorporated and made part of the applicable plan for the State of Tennessee.

[51 FR 5505, Feb. 13, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 45137, Nov. 24, 1987]

§ 52.2235 Control strategy: Ozone.
top
(a) Determination—EPA is determining that, as of August 8, 1995, the Nashville ozone nonattainment area has attained the ozone standard and that the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act do not apply to the area for so long as the area does not monitor any violations of the ozone standard. If a violation of the ozone NAAQS is monitored in the Nashville ozone nonattainment area, these determinations shall no longer apply.

(b) Nonregulatory provisions for the implementation of a basic I/M program in Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and Wilson Counties, submitted on July 13, 1994, were approved by EPA on September 26, 1995.

[60 FR 40292, Aug. 8, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 47290, Sept. 12, 1995]

§ 52.2236 Control strategy; lead.
top
The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation has submitted revisions to the Tennessee SIP on October 6, 1994. These revisions address the requirements necessary to change a lead nonattainment area to attainment. The maintenance plan for the Fayette County area near Rossville, Tennessee is comprised of a maintenance demonstration and NSR/PSD program. For areas where the only lead source has shut down, these components are sufficient for an approvable maintenance plan. The State's maintenance plan is complete and satisfies all of the requirements of section 175(A) of the CAA.

[60 FR 43020, Aug. 18, 1995]

§ 52.2237 NOX RACT and NOX conformity exemption.
top
Approval. EPA is approving the section 182(f) oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT) and NOX conformity exemption request submitted by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation on March 21, 1995, for the five county middle Tennessee (Nashville) ozone moderate nonattainment area. This approval exempts the area from implementing federal NOX RACT on major sources of NOX and exempts Tennessee from NOX conformity. This approval does not exempt sources from any State required or State Implementation Plan (SIP) approved NOX controls. If a violation of the ozone NAAQS occurs in the area, the exemption from the requirement of section 182(f) of the CAA in the applicable area shall not apply.

[61 FR 54946, Oct. 23, 1996]

§ 52.2239 Original Identification of plan section.
top
(a) This section identifies the original “Tennessee Air Pollution Control Implementation Plan” and all revisions submitted by Tennessee that were federally approved prior to December 1, 1998.

(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 27, 1972.

(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.

(1) Certification of public hearing submitted on February 3, 1972, by the Division of Air Pollution Control of the Tennessee Department of Public Health.

(2) Miscellaneous corrections to emission inventories submitted on February 10, 1972, by the Division of Air Pollution Control of the Tennessee Department of Public Health.

(3) Statements of intent for intergovernmental cooperation submitted on April 13, 1972, by the Division of Air Pollution Control of the Tennessee Department of Public Health.

(4) City of Memphis Air Pollution Control Code submitted on April 27, 1972, by the Division of Air Pollution Control of the Tennessee Department of Public Health and the Memphis and Shelby County Health Department.

(5) Minor addition to the Tennessee Code, Section 53–3422, submitted on May 3, 1972, by the Division of Air Pollution Control of the Tennessee Department of Public Health.

(6) Clarifying comments on the plan submitted on May 8, 1972, by the Division of Air Pollution Control of the Tennessee Department of Public Health.

(7) Statement of public availability of emission data submitted on May 12, 1972, by the Division of Air Pollution Control of the Tennessee Department of Public Health.

(8) Miscellaneous changes to Chapters II, III, VII, IX and XII of the plan; regulations of Memphis-Shelby County and Knoxville-Knox County and resolutions concerning local programs of Davidson, Hamilton and Shelby Counties submitted on August 17, 1972, by the Governor.

(9) Revised emission limits for asphalt plants, cotton gins and Kraft mills and establishment of new source performance standards submitted on February 16, 1973, by the Tennessee Department of Public Health. (continued)