Loading (50 kb)...'
(continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Replace existing treatment plant with AWT plant: chemical/activated sludge/multi-media filtration to achieve 95 percent removals or better. Design capacity=7.5 mgd.
8. Applicable Standards. State Standards. SD Code: Water Poll—Chapter 61, 1960 Supp. SD Code: Public Health—Chapter 27, 1960 Supp. Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters: Reg E–1.10A (Rev.).
Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 125, 133, PL 92–500, SS 301, 313, PL 92–500, S 402–NPDES, NPDES Permit Number-SD0012345, Permit Period—1974–1979.
9. Project Schedule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Regulation
schedule_month schedule_month
and year and year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)..................... 4-75 N/A
Construction (start).................... 6-75 5-75
Construction (completion)............... 2-77 1-77
Operation (start)....................... 4-77 N/A
Final compliance........................ 6-77 7-77
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation schedule as required by NPDES permit. State water quality standard requires adequate secondary treatment by 1/74.
Unable to meet State requirement because of design problems and funding cycle. State has permitted delay on condition NPDES permit deadline is met.
10. Other Relevant Information. Installation may become surplus in FY 75 or FY 76 leading to project discontinuance.
Funding.
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year
MCA -----------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programed..................... 0 $8,000 0 0 0
Unprogramed................... 0 0 0 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 10–4
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army.
Media: Solid Waste.
Project No.: A-001 Date Prepared: 2/11/74 Date Revised: GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities
Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Camp landfill.
3. Amount of Pollution. Leachate of high BOD concentration.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. Landfill is used for disposal of installation wastes. Due to frequent rains, wastes build up high moisture content and leachate, which emanates from side of fill. Also, area is noted to be a common breeding ground for flies and mosquitos, and is generally unsightly.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. a. Landfill receives 10 tons per day of solid waste altogether, 5 from the Camp and 5 from the nearby Lindberg Air Base. It consists mainly of normal municipal-type wastes delivered on Monday, Wednesday and Friday of each week. Once a week a large load of oily rags is dumped in one corner of the landfill site.
b. Landfill was first opened in Summer of 1970 and is designed to operate until 1990.
c. Some control of run-off waters is exercised by a trench on the downhill side of landfill draining into a settling pond.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Trench prevents run-off waters from entering local bay waters, but does not solve vector, or aesthetic problems, nor does it minimize the amount of leachate forming.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Purchase of bulldozer to compact and cover wastes, minimize formation of leachate, control vectors, and improve general appearance. Relocate landfill to area with better drainage.
8. Applicable Standards. EPA Guidelines for Land Disposal of Solid Wastes, published in Federal Register July 1, 1974, requirements under §§241.204, 241.207, 241.208, 241.209, and 241.210.
9. Project Schedule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule schedule
month and month and
year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)............................. N/A N/A
Construction (start)............................ N/A N/A
Construction (completion)....................... N/A N/A
Begin procurement action........................ 7-75 N/A
Operation (start)............................... 7-76 N/A
Final compliance................................ 7-76 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Other Relevant Information. Station planning to build an incinerator in 1980 to extend life of landfill.
11. Funding.
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
---------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PEMA:
Programed....................... 0 0 0 0 0
Unprogramed..................... $30 0 0 0 0
OMA:
Programed engineering study..... $3 0 0 0 0
Unprogramed construction new ...... $10 ...... ...... ......
landfill.......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 10–5
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army.
Media: Radiation.
Project No.: A-001 Date Prepared: 6/14/74 Date Revised: 6/15/74 GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway, Power Reactor.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Tritium in primary water cooling system.
3. Amount of Pollution. Tritium concerntrates exceed new NRC, EPA and DA standards for discharge of primary coolant water.
4. Pollution Source and Discharge, Emission or Deposit Point. Primary coolant water discharged to holding tank and then periodically released to Lake Enny.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measure. Holding tank before release to lake.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Only limited decay obtained from retention in holding tank.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Redesign holding tank system to include addition of ion exchanger.
8. Applicable Standards and Regulations. 10 CFR parts 20 and 50, 40 CFR part 190 and AR 385–80.
9. Project Schedule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule_month schedule_month
and year and year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)..................... 2-75 N/A
Construction (start).................... 5-75 N/A
Construction (completion)............... 7-75 N/A
Operation (start)....................... 8-75 N/A
Final compliance........................ 8-75 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Other Relevant Information. None.
11. Funding.
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
MCA ---------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program......................... $375 ...... ...... ...... ......
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 10–6
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Noise
Project No.: A-001 Date Prepared: 6/1/74 Date Revised: GSA Inventory Control No.: 45678
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway.
Address: Mulch City, Enny County, SD
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific Type of Pollution. Noise is broadband with discernible tones. (Noise is nonimpulsive; it is continuous at a steady in level, but with a discernible tone).
3. Amount of Pollution. The source measures 75 dBA at the property line. Source is 20 feet from boundary line at a height of 15 feet. Facilities or areas affected: Civilian school and housing (off the installation).
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. One power plant with forced draft fans and cooling tower.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. No noise control exists. Acoustic expertise-Acoustics, Inc., Chicago, IL.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. None.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problems. Installation of commercially available mufflers on all forced draft fans and noise enclosure on cooling tower. It is expected that this action will lower the sound level below the background noise.
8. Applicable Standards. Mulch Noise Ordinance, Section 4–12, Chapter 17 of the Municipal Code of Mulch, requires that the noise level at the boundary line in business and commercial districts not exceed 62 dBA.
9. Project Schedule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule_month schedule_month
and year and year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)..................... 9-76 N/A
Construction (start).................... 11-74 N/A
Construction (completion)............... 2-77 N/A
Operation (start)....................... 3-77 N/A
Final compliance........................ 4-77 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The standards require immediate compliance. Agency schedule provides for earliest possible installation of control measures.
10. Other Relevant Information. (a) Community complaints have included 26 telephone calls, 15 letters, and 3 personal visits. Nature of complaints centered upon annoyance. (Log of noise complaints attached.)
(b) Legal action has not been initiated but may be by County School Board.
11. Funding.
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
OMA ---------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Mufflers on forced draft
fans:
Programed..................... ...... $25 ...... ...... ......
Unprogramed................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
(b) Enclosures on cooling tower:
Programed..................... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
Unprogramed................... ...... $10 ...... ...... ......
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 10–7
Exhibit 1
circular no. a–106
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Project Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Pesticides & Hazardous/Toxic Materials
Project No.: A-002 Date Prepared: Sept. 15, 1974 Date Revised: ____________ GSA Inventory Control No.:
1. Facility.
Name: Camp Faraway. Address: Mulch City, Enny County, S.D.
Agency Contact: Col. John Smith, Facilities Engineer (615) 755–0022.
2. Specific type of pollution. The following pesticides registered for the control of pests: malathion, diazinon, chlorpyrifos, propoxur, lindane, chlordane.
3. Amount of Pollution. Quantities of pesticide concentrate mixed per month: Malathion, 10 gal; diazinon, 10 gal; chlorpyrifos, 7 gal; propoxur, 10 gal; lindane, 2 gal; chlordane, 10 gal.
4. Pollution Source, and Discharge, Emission, or Deposit Point. N/A.
5. Existing Treatment and Other Control Measures. Mixing sink with sump.
6. Effectiveness of Existing Treatment and Control. Sink too small. Inadequate neutralization and sump capacity. Requires manual bailing.
7. Remedial Measures Proposed and Estimated Effect in Correcting Problem. Replace small mixing sink with larger double mixing sink. Install a neutralization and holding tank with sump pump for pesticide rinses.
8. Applicable Standards. Executive Order 11643—Environmental Safeguards on Activities for Animal Damage Control on Federal Lands. February 8, 1972. Additionally, the EPA, under statutory authority of Section 4, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended by the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act.
9. Project Schedule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Agency
schedule_month schedule_month
and year and year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design (completion)..................... 10-75 N/A
Construction (start).................... 1-76 N/A
Construction (completion)............... 3-76 N/A
Operation (start)....................... 4-76 N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Other Relevant Information. Other stocks of suspended on finally cancelled pesticides will be stored until proper disposal methods are developed. Inventory: 5 percent DDT in oil—350 gallons; 75 percent DDT wettable powder—220 lbs.
11. Funding Schedule.
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
OMA ---------------------------------------
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programed....................... $3.0 0 0 0 0
Unprogramed..................... 0 0 0 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Figure 10–8
Exhibit 1–EM
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Proposed Management Report
Agency: Department of the Army
Media: Management
Date Prepared: 1 Oct 74 Date Revised: GSA Inventory Control No.: 12345
1. Facility.
Name: Fort Stoner.
Address: Podunk, Organ County, SD
Agency Contact: Col J. J. Jones, Facility Engineer, AV 823–1555.
2. Resource Identification. Training.
3. Explanation and Justification of Resource Requirement. Training is required for sewage treatment plant superintendent, operators and laboratory technician to meet certification standards of South Dakota. A new sewage treatment plant will be put into operation in December 1975 and trained personnel will be required to operate it. Current personnel are not familiar with the operation of the new plant and require instructions on State requirements and standards.
4. Proposed Resource Schedule. Training offered at University of South Dakota. Attendance at one-week courses is as follows:
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
OMA ---------------------------------------
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Superintendent.................. ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
Operator........................ ...... 2 2 1 1
Lab technician.................. ...... 1 ...... ...... ......
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Funding.
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal years
OMA ---------------------------------------
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programed....................... $0.2 $0.6 ...... ...... ......
Unprogramed..................... ...... ...... $0.4 $0.2 $0.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Other Relevant Information. Outyear requirements reflect training for new hires.
Figure 10–9
Exhibit 2
pollution status report
------------------------------------------------------------
(media)
Appropriation account: _________ (OMA, MCA,
etc.)
Agency Page ___ of ___
Agency contact Reporting Date _________
Telephone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project name and Project costs ($1,000's)_Amount in President's budget or agency plan or amount appropriated or funded
location (GSA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Present cost
Project No. inventory Current fiscal estimate Status
control No.) Fiscal year -2 Fiscal year -1 year Fiscal year +1 Fiscal year +2 Fiscal year +3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Provide totals on the last page for each appropriation account.
Figure 10–10
Appendix A to Part 650—Procedures for the Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties
top
FRIDAY, JANUARY 25, 1974
WASHINGTON, DC
Volume 39—Number 18
PART II
See Federal Register 39 FR 3366–3370, January 25, 1974.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Procedures for the Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties